Google News 
R&B singer Jill Scott has faced intense criticism and backlash for her performance of the US National Anthem during the annual Essence Festival in New Orleans on Sunday, as part of the Independence Day celebrations. Scott's rendition of the anthem took a provocative and woke approach, with altered lyrics that addressed the black experience in America.
She sang, "Oh, say, can you see, by the blood in the streets, this place doesn't smile on you, colored child." This powerful opening set the tone for her performance, as she continued to sing, "Whose blood built this land with sweat and their hands.
But we'll die in this place and your memory erased." Scott's choice to modify the lyrics of the national anthem struck a chord with many, leading to a wave of criticism. By changing the words to "not the land of the free but the home of the slaves," she made a bold statement about the ongoing struggles and injustices faced by black Americans.
While some applauded her for addressing systemic issues and historical truths, others accused her of disrespecting the national anthem and using the occasion to attack American culture.
Debate Ignited: Addressing Social Issues
The Essence Festival, known for celebrating black music and culture, provided Scott with a platform to express her views.
However, her performance sparked a heated debate about the appropriate way to address social issues during national celebrations. Supporters argued that art and music have historically been used to shed light on societal problems and provoke dialogue, while critics contended that the national anthem should be respected as a symbol of unity and patriotism.
The incident further highlighted the ongoing tension surrounding discussions of race and history in the United States. It underscored the divide between those advocating for change and justice and those who prioritize tradition and national symbols.
The controversy surrounding Scott's rendition of the national anthem serves as a reminder of the complex and often contentious nature of conversations surrounding patriotism, identity, and the acknowledgment of historical truths.
As the discussion continues to unfold, it remains to be seen whether Scott's provocative performance will lead to a broader examination of the national anthem's meaning and the role of art in addressing social issues. It has undoubtedly ignited passionate conversations about the state of America and the ongoing struggle for equality and justice.