Letitia James Unveils 'Smoking Gun' in Case Against Donald Trump, Attorney

Revelations emerge from Trump's financial statements audit..

by Nouman Rasool
Letitia James Unveils 'Smoking Gun' in Case Against Donald Trump, Attorney
© Scott Eisen/Getty Images

In a significant development in the ongoing civil fraud case against former President Donald Trump, New York Attorney General Letitia James has reportedly encountered a pivotal piece of evidence. According to legal experts, this could substantially strengthen the case against Trump.

During recent testimony, Jeffrey McConney, the former corporate controller of the Trump Organization, indicated that Trump was personally involved in reviewing financial statements before their finalization. This revelation directly contradicts earlier statements and throws a new light on Trump's alleged role in the financial operations of his company.

In an interview with Mary Trump, the former president's estranged niece, legal analyst Joe Gallina described this as a detrimental day for Trump in the New York City fraud case. He referred to the testimony as the "smoking gun" Attorney General Letitia James had been searching for, marking a critical turn in the investigation.

The lawsuit, initiated by James, accuses Trump and his company executives, including his adult sons, of inflating his net worth in financial statements. This alleged exaggeration, reportedly by as much as $3.5 billion, was purportedly done to gain favorable terms on loans and insurance deals.

Trump has consistently refuted these allegations, maintaining his innocence.

2014 Draft: Trump's Review

In a striking development, court documents revealed a draft of Trump's 2014 net worth statement with a handwritten note stating: "DJT TO GET FINAL REVIEW." This note is particularly significant, as Trump had previously distanced himself from the preparation of these statements during a pretrial deposition.

Legal experts point out that the uncovering of this document, handed over by the accountancy firm Mazars rather than the Trump Organization, raises questions about Trump's compliance with state subpoenas and the authenticity of the documents provided by his organization.

Gallina highlighted the potential legal ramifications of this development, suggesting that the attorney general's office could consider a spoilage motion, implying that the Trump Organization might have tainted evidence by not retaining or providing necessary information.

This latest twist in the case adds to the mounting challenges for Trump. As Gallina noted, the continuous revelation of fraudulent practices within Trump's enterprise significantly bolsters James' case. He concluded that the severity of the potential damages and the ongoing issues with document production make it increasingly difficult for Trump to extricate himself from this legal entanglement. Representatives for Trump have been contacted for comment, but there has been no response at the time of reporting.

Donald Trump