Rob Schneider Booed at Charity Event for Anti-Trans Jokes

Charity Event Eclipsed by Controversial Comedy Performance.

by Nouman Rasool
SHARE
Rob Schneider Booed at Charity Event for Anti-Trans Jokes
© Frazer Harrison/Getty Images

The Hospitals of Regina Foundation have issued an apology after a charity performance turned awkwardly controversial when comedian Rob Schneider made the audience visibly uncomfortable and had to leave the stage before his scheduled exit.

The incident took place in the middle of a fundraising event that was going on at Conexus Arts Centre to raise funds for local hospitals. The event raised $350,000, though it didn't occur without a hitch. Some people said the comedian's performance was alienating because of its tasteless jokes about vaccines, women, and transgender folks.

The sold-out audience gave its reaction during a routine from Schneider, which contained few laughs and was instead punctuated with groans and whispers of disapproval. The Regina Leader-Post described the attendees' response as "roundly booed." It is not the first such case of reaction in recent Schneider performances: he was similarly removed from a stage at a Republican networking event last year after similar content incensed the audience so much that walkouts began.

Foundation Denounces Act

The Hospitals of Regina Foundation was also being criticized for the act of Schneider. The foundation said in a release denouncing what was done on stage. "While we recognize that in a free and democratic society, individuals are entitled to their views and opinions and that comedy is intended to be edgy, the content, positions, and opinions expressed during Mr.

Schneider's set do not align with the values of our foundation and team," the statement read. The foundation clarified that they did not support or endorse the views of Schneider and appreciated that his act was not up to expectations and organizational values.

The performance Schneider was stopped mid-set and complied by leaving the stage immediately. The foundation also offered the audience an "unconditional apology" immediately after the event. However, there are still questions about the vetting process itself.

Tynan Allan, a witness at the event, said that she was a little surprised the foundation did not know of the controversial views of Schneider that were well-known and have been consistent. With this incident came questions about how far a charity should go in taking on board celebrities with possibly dwindling public support and the need for such charity organizations to do background checks before aligning with celebrities in such events, particularly in sensitive environments.

This experience by the foundation further affirms the challenges and possible consequences that alignment with public figures having controversial stances can have, and the risks often outweigh the charitable intentions in alienating supporters.

SHARE