Elon Musk Loses Bid to Dismiss Defamation Case

Legal Battle Escalates Over False Neo-Nazi Allegations.

by Nouman Rasool
Elon Musk Loses Bid to Dismiss Defamation Case
© Apu Gomes/Getty Images

In a recent judicial decision that has captured significant attention, a Texas judge ruled against dismissing a defamation lawsuit aimed at tech mogul Elon Musk. The lawsuit, filed on behalf of Ben Brody, a 22-year-old Jewish man from California, accuses Musk of erroneously identifying him as involved in a neo-Nazi brawl in Oregon last year.

This lawsuit traces back to Musk's activity on the social media platform X, previously known as Twitter, where he used his substantial influence to suggest that Brody, a recent college graduate, was a federal agent embedded in the violent clash.

Musk's post, which has become a pivotal element of this legal challenge, speculated, “Looks like one is a college student (who wants to join the govt) and another is maybe an Antifa member, but nonetheless a probable false flag situation”.

The repercussions for Brody were immediate and severe. He reported having to leave his home due to a barrage of harassing messages and threats following Musk's speculative post. As a result, Brody is now seeking damages exceeding $1 million.

Attorney Denounces 'Shakedown'

Mark Bankston, Brody’s attorney, responded to the court's decision with a pointed statement on X, addressing the dismissal attempt by Musk's legal team as nothing more than a 'shakedown.'

He expressed pride in the judge’s decision to allow the defamation claim to proceed, emphasizing the seriousness of the accusations against Brody. Elon Musk has not tweeted or commented about the decision, and his lawyer, Alex Spiro, did not release any statements.

Of course, this is not the first failure that Musk has faced during this entire, long legal process. Details from Musk’s deposition, which surfaced in April and were first reported by HuffPost, revealed his admission of a "limited understanding" of the accusations against him and acknowledged his lack of research before alleging Brody's involvement.

Musk also disclosed during his deposition the use of a burner account on X to impersonate his toddler son, further complicating his public and legal image. Despite efforts by Spiro to keep the deposition transcript confidential, their requests were denied, allowing public access to Musk’s statements and adding layers to the public discourse surrounding this case.

This ruling by state District Judge Maria Cantú Hexsel marks a significant moment in the litigation, potentially setting the stage for more revelations as the lawsuit progresses.

Elon Musk