Prince Harry's High Court Security Appeal Denied

High Court Rules on Royal's Security Arrangement Dispute

by Zain ul Abedin
SHARE
Prince Harry's High Court Security Appeal Denied
© Bryan Bedder/Getty Images

In a recent judgment from the High Court, Prince Harry's bid to contest the British government's decision on his security detail within the UK has been met with disappointment. The Duke of Suss-x sought to challenge an earlier verdict that led to a downgrade in his security arrangement after he relinquished his duties as an active member of the royal family.

The heart of Prince Harry's argument, presented by his legal team, was centered around the perceived unfairness in the decision-making process regarding his security status. The Home Office, on the other hand, maintained that his security needs were considered individually.

During the legal challenge initiated in December, attorneys for the Home Office informed the High Court that Prince Harry would continue to receive police protection funded by the public. However, this would be under "bespoke arrangements" uniquely designed for him, diverging from the standard security measures allocated to royals in active service.

Security Challenge Verdict

The confidentiality surrounding the legal proceedings, especially those dealing with security protocols for high-profile individuals, led to much of the discussion being conducted behind closed doors last December.

The decision, handed down by the esteemed retired High Court judge Sir Peter Lane, carries potential implications for Prince Harry's future visits to his home country. He has previously expressed concerns that the revised security level complicates the logistics of traveling to the UK with his family.

Judge Lane's verdict affirmed the legality of the decision to alter Prince Harry's security classification, dismissing any claims of unlawful action or procedural bias in the process. The judgment, spanning 51 pages with certain sections redacted for privacy, criticized Prince Harry's legal representatives for their rigid interpretation of the Ravec procedure.

Ravec, the Royal and VIP Executive Committee, oversees security arrangements for the Royal Family and other distinguished individuals, operating under the Home Office in collaboration with the Metropolitan Police, the Cabinet Office, and the royal household.

Furthermore, the judgment underscored the legality of the "bespoke" security measures devised for Prince Harry by Ravec, establishing their soundness within the legal framework. This ruling follows a previous legal setback for Prince Harry, where his request to personally finance police protection during his visits to the UK was denied.

The focus of that case, similar to this, revolved around his diminished security since stepping back from his royal duties. Currently residing in the United States with his wife Meghan and their two children, Prince Harry was notably absent from the December court proceedings.

Prince Harry
SHARE