Watergate Prosecutor Cautions Trump: 'Strong Case' Ahead


Watergate Prosecutor Cautions Trump: 'Strong Case' Ahead
© David Becker/Getty Images

In a recent CNN NewsNight interview with Abby Phillip, Nick Akerman, a former Watergate prosecutor, expressed a formidable viewpoint on Donald Trump's impending trial in New York. The trial concerns payments to adult film actress Stormy Daniels and, according to Akerman, holds a robust legal standing comparable to Trump's other ongoing legal challenges.

The focus of the trial, set to commence on March 25, revolves around accusations that Trump orchestrated a scheme to falsify records while reimbursing his then-lawyer, Michael Cohen. These reimbursements were allegedly for a payment to Daniels in 2016, intended to prevent her from disclosing their past relationship during Trump's presidential campaign.

Despite facing 34 felony charges related to this case, Trump maintains his innocence, dismissing the accusations as a politically motivated attempt to thwart his potential return to the White House. Stormy Daniels has indicated her readiness to testify in the trial, adding a significant layer to the proceedings.

At this juncture, it remains unclear whether Trump will be present at the trial. Efforts to reach Trump's office for comment have been made by Newsweek.

Akerman Challenges Perspective

During the CNN segment, Phillip referenced a Washington Post article that downplayed the gravity of this particular case compared to Trump's other legal entanglements.

However, Akerman strongly contested this view, emphasizing the case's potential impact on the 2016 election's integrity. He highlighted the involvement of Cohen and David Pecker of the National Enquirer, both set to corroborate the alleged scheme to silence women with stories potentially damaging to Trump's campaign.

Akerman's stance underscores the significance of this case, distinguishing it from Trump's other legal battles. The Washington Post article, quoting criminal defense lawyer Ronald Kuby, noted the relatively straightforward nature of the hush-money case compared to the complexity of other cases involving presidential immunity, classified information, and extensive indictments.

This trial, notably the first criminal case filed against Trump, was initiated by Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg in March 2023. It gains prominence as it follows the postponement of a federal interference trial in Washington D.C., initially scheduled for March 4.

The unfolding events in this trial could have profound implications, not only for Donald Trump but also for the broader landscape of American politics and legal accountability.