Tom Sandoval Calls Ariana Madix 'Petty' for Rejecting $3.1M Deal


Tom Sandoval Calls Ariana Madix 'Petty' for Rejecting $3.1M Deal
© Greg Doherty/Getty Images

In the latest development of a high-profile property dispute, Tom Sandoval, a prominent figure in the entertainment industry, has publicly accused his former partner Ariana Madix of failing to contribute financially to their shared home.

The couple, whose relationship ended last year after nearly a decade, has been embroiled in legal complexities since Madix initiated a lawsuit to sell their jointly-owned property in Valley Village. Sandoval, speaking on Nick Viall's podcast "The Viall Files," revealed that Madix rejected what he considers a reasonable offer for the property.

He proposed a buyout sum of $3.1 million, intending to amicably settle the dispute. The 40-year-old singer expressed his frustration, insisting that his offer was made in good faith and aimed at resolving the situation without further conflict.

Sandoval Counters Criticism

Contradicting claims that his insistence on retaining the house is irrational, Sandoval stated, "Ariana is making it out to be that me wanting to keep the house is a psychopath move, but it's not." He further alleged that Madix has not contributed to any household expenses for the past eight months and has not resided in their home for two to three months.

He likened the situation to a player overturning a Monopoly board in frustration, indicating his perception of Madix's approach to their disagreement. The lawsuit filed by Madix requests a 'partition by sale,' indicating her desire for a judicial intervention to enforce the property's sale.

This move is intended to facilitate the equitable distribution of the proceeds from the sale. The legal battle has garnered significant attention, highlighting the complexities and emotional toll of high-profile relationship breakdowns and property disputes in the public eye.

As the case unfolds, it underscores the challenges that can arise when personal relationships intersect with shared financial interests, particularly in the high-stakes world of celebrity real estate. The resolution of this dispute will likely set a precedent for how similar cases are handled in the future, especially among public figures.