Donald Trump Trial: Judge's Lawyer Cites Violence Risk for Gag Order

Key Developments Emerge in High-Profile Trump Organization Trial.

by Nouman Rasool
SHARE
Donald Trump Trial: Judge's Lawyer Cites Violence Risk for Gag Order
© Scott Olson/GettyImages

In a high-stakes legal battle that could significantly impact his wealth and business legacy, former President Donald Trump, alongside his sons, Eric Trump and Donald Trump Jr., and key executives of the Trump Organization, faces a $250 million civil lawsuit in New York.

The lawsuit, brought by New York Attorney General Letitia James, alleges a decade-long scheme involving "numerous acts of fraud and misrepresentation" to inflate Trump's net worth for favorable loan terms. This trial follows a judge's partial summary judgment that Trump submitted "fraudulent valuations" of assets, focusing the trial on determining additional actions and potential penalties.

Trump, steadfast in his innocence, attributes the alleged inflated valuations to his business acumen. However, the case has taken a dramatic turn with Judge Arthur Engoron's lawyer arguing for a gag order, citing the potential for violence from Trump's supporters.

This development follows Trump's legal challenge against the gag orders, which temporarily prohibit him from commenting on the judge's staff. The judges panel recently upheld these orders.

Eric's Testimony Cancelled

The trial's latest updates include the unexpected cancellation of Eric Trump's testimony, a strategic move by the defense to streamline their case.

Trump, who had directed Eric not to testify, plans to take the stand himself as the final defense witness. His testimony is highly anticipated, especially since a request to delay it, pending an appeal against the gag order, was denied by Judge Engoron.

In a surprising turn, the defense's real estate valuation expert, Lawrence Moens, compared Trump to notable historical figures like John Lennon and Martin Luther King Jr., while valuing Trump's Mar-a-Lago estate at $1.2 billion.

This valuation, however, was contested by the state attorney, highlighting inconsistencies in Moens' methodology. Moens, also a Mar-a-Lago member, defended his valuation approach, likening it to an intuitive process akin to baking a cake without a recipe.

The defense's focus on the value of Mar-a-Lago is central to the case, given its contested valuation in Trump's financial statements. Trump has vehemently disputed the assessment by Judge Engoron, who found a significant discrepancy between Trump's valuation and the property's tax appraisal.

The trial continues to unravel these complex financial and legal disputes, as Trump's testimony looms, potentially offering crucial insights into the case. This ongoing trial, with its blend of high-profile personalities, complex legal arguments, and potential repercussions for Trump's future, continues to captivate public interest and remains a key story in national news.

Donald Trump
SHARE