Google News 
In a dramatic turn of events, the Senate Health, Education, Labor and Pensions Committee witnessed an intense altercation between Oklahoma Senator Markwayne Mullin and Sean O'Brien, President of the International Brotherhood of Teamsters, on Tuesday.
The confrontation, marked by sharp exchanges and challenges to a physical fight, nearly transformed the committee room into a battleground reminiscent of The Octagon, referencing the mixed martial arts fighting arena. Senator Mullin, a Republican and former mixed martial arts fighter, confronted O'Brien over the union leader's disparaging remarks on social media.
The tension escalated rapidly as Mullin, diverging from his defense of "right to work" states like Oklahoma, known for their unfriendly stance towards labor unions, began citing O'Brien's tweets from a previous encounter in June.
These tweets labeled Mullin, who boasts a substantial personal fortune, as a "clown" and "fraud," questioning his self-made image.
Senate Showdown Halts
In a heated moment during the hearing, Mullin challenged O'Brien to settle their dispute physically, suggesting they could act as "two consenting adults" to resolve their differences.
The exchange grew more contentious as O'Brien, a fourth-generation Teamster, responded kindly, leading Mullin to invite him to stand up for a confrontation. This extraordinary scene was momentarily halted by Senator Bernie Sanders, the committee chairman, who firmly instructed both parties to resume their seats.
Sanders, emphasizing the etiquette expected in the Senate, expressed his concern about public contempt for Congress. Despite Sanders' intervention, the verbal sparring continued, with Mullin referencing O'Brien's record within the union and proposing a charity match in Tulsa next year.
The senator's biography highlights his undefeated record in the MMA ring. However, there appears to be some discrepancy in the details of his fighting history, as noted by MMA sites Tapology and Sherdog. Senator Sanders eventually regained control of the situation, redirecting the focus to relevant economic issues and firmly stating that the hearing was not an arena for discussing physical altercations.
This incident highlights the heightened tensions within political discourse and raises questions about the boundaries of professional conduct in the political arena.
