The Duke of Suss*x, Prince Harry, has recently been the subject of intense scrutiny following remarks characterised as unpredictable and hostile by royal commentators. The latest wave of criticism comes in the wake of a statement released by Harry, which has been pointedly described as ill-timed by Royal Family commentator Richard Fitzwilliams.
In a detailed analysis for the Daily Express US, Fitzwilliams criticized the Duke and Duchess of Suss*x's decision to publicize their grievances regarding the Royal Family's invitation protocol. He suggested that the timing of their statement, which coincided with King Charles' inaugural parliamentary address, was inopportune and indicative of deeper rifts within the royal household.
This, Fitzwilliams argues, could significantly delay any hopes for reconciliation. The article, which has garnered significant attention, delves into the complexities of trust within the Royal Family, especially in light of the Suss*xes' recent actions.
Fitzwilliams questioned the couple's decision-making, particularly their choice to announce their non-involvement in King Charles' 75th birthday celebrations on such a momentous day for the monarch.
Royal Rift Intensifies
Fitzwilliams further labelled the couple's behaviour as a source of deep resentment among royal circles, emphasizing the unpredictability and perceived hostility emanating from Harry and Meghan.
He speculated on the couple's indifference to the snub of the birthday invite, suggesting that their estrangement from royal duties and the release of Harry's memoir, "Spare," have only deepened the divide. The commentator did not shy away from discussing the potential future implications of this estrangement, which casts a shadow over King Charles' reign.
Despite the King's decisive action to end the Suss*xes' residence at Frogmore Cottage post-memoir release, Fitzwilliams notes that the royal family must now navigate the challenges posed by a couple who continue to defy expectations and exhibit an aggressive stance.
As the royal family and the public grapple with the unfolding drama, the question of what lies ahead remains. Fitzwilliams' commentary leaves readers pondering the delicate balance of familial and public duty, the complexities of royal reconciliation, and the unpredictable nature of the Suss*xes' next move.