Robert De Niro's Company Pays Ex-Assistant $1.2M in Settlement

• celebrities

In a resounding conclusion to a contentious legal skirmish, a New York jury has mandated Robert De Niro's production firm, Canal Productions, to compensate its former aide, Graham Chase Robinson, with a hefty $1.2 million in the wake of allegations of gender discrimination and retaliatory conduct.

The verdict, which cast a spotlight on the prominent ‘Casino’ actor’s business practices, marks the closure of a trial that held the media and public gaze. Canal Productions came under fire as the ex-assistant leveled severe charges against the company, claiming a workplace environment rife with inappropriateness and biased against female employees.

The company faced scrutiny over claims that De Niro, an iconic figure in cinema, fostered an abusive work atmosphere. Despite the explosive nature of the allegations, it is crucial to delineate that the liability rested with De Niro's enterprise, not the actor personally.

Robinson's Legal Turmoil

The dispute first erupted into the public eye when De Niro’s company initiated legal proceedings against Robinson. The suit alleged financial impropriety on her part, including misappropriated airline miles and unauthorized expenses.

The accusation extended to characterizing her as an unproductive employee indulging in personal leisure—such as watching 'Friends' during work hours—at the company's expense. In a fierce riposte, Robinson sought $12 million in damages, contending that De Niro compelled her to undertake duties she deemed beneath her executive status, which she saw as indicative of a broader pattern of gender bias.

Her testimony included allegations of being underpaid compared to male counterparts and enduring demeaning tasks, such as back-scratching and enduring personal calls in an unprofessional context. Adding to the trial’s intrigue were her accusations directed at De Niro’s partner, Tiffany Chen, whom Robinson described as manipulative and aggressive.

Throughout the trial, De Niro’s rebuttals made headlines, with the actor vehemently dismissing the claims as baseless. The jury, however, after a brisk five-hour deliberation following the two-week trial, sided with Robinson, signaling a powerful message on workplace conduct standards.

The outcome leaves the industry pondering whether this case will prompt an appeal or spark broader discussions on the treatment of assistants in high-stakes entertainment environments. For now, the focus remains on the ramifications of the jury's decision and the precedent it sets for gender equality and corporate accountability in the celebrity circuit.

The resolution of this case, steeped in dramatic testimonies and legal theatrics, underscores the evolving landscape of workplace rights amid the glittering allure of show business.