King Charles' First Year: A Reign Marked by Continuity and Calm

Recent events at Buckingham Palace raise eyebrows and concerns.

by Nouman Rasool
King Charles' First Year: A Reign Marked by Continuity and Calm
© WPA Pool/GettyImages

One year into King Charles' reign, and the legacy of Queen Elizabeth II is still palpable. In a private moment of reflection, the King chose to commemorate his first year as monarch at Balmoral, reminiscent of the late Queen's own practices.

As the world watched the transition from the era of Queen Elizabeth to King Charles, the steadiness has been comforting. Royal commentator, Pauline Maclaran, succinctly summed up the year as "surprising in its lack of surprises." In this first year, Charles has not veered dramatically from the traditions, carrying the weight of the crown much like his mother.

Prof Maclaran and Anna Whitelock, esteemed royal historians, see this year as an extended period of mourning, suggesting that more significant changes could manifest later in his reign. The rituals and grand events we've come to expect from the royal calendar have remained unchanged.

As historian Heather Jones noted, "Monarchy is a long game." The lack of political cycles allows monarchs the luxury of time. King Charles' first year saw his successful state visit to Germany and a more inclusive Coronation ceremony.

Palace Incident: Swift Resolution

However, it hasn't been without hiccups. The Ngozi Fulani incident at Buckingham Palace, wherein a black British guest faced awkward racial insinuations, brought some momentary discomfort.

Nevertheless, the King and the Palace managed a swift resolution. King Charles' environmental concerns have continued to be a focal point of his public life. His wife's transition to "Queen Camilla" has also been smooth, modernized by her decisions, like discontinuing the tradition of "ladies in waiting" and addressing contemporary issues such as domestic violence.

Still, there's debate around her title, with some, including Princess Diana's former secretary, favoring "Princess Consort." Prince Harry's memoirs might have shaken the institution's image but painted King Charles as more of a sympathetic figure.

Meanwhile, speculations around Prince Andrew's public return remain just that – speculations. Prof Jones raises pertinent questions about royal finances and the monarchy's historical ties to slavery. These unresolved concerns loom large, especially with growing sentiments against the monarchy, particularly among the youth.

Recent polls indicate a clear majority supporting the monarchy, but opposition, especially among the younger generations, is growing. Despite this, King Charles' personal approval ratings are healthy, reflecting a successful first year.

His approachability and willingness to engage with the public has been lauded by historians, like Jonathan Spangler. However, as Prof Whitelock mentions, the younger generation's desire for impactful use of platforms presents a challenge for the King.

Addressing socio-economic grievances and aligning with modern concerns, like sustainability and food poverty, will be crucial. At 74, King Charles' ascension is historically significant. With age comes the inevitability of transition, casting Prince William as an essential figure for the monarchy's future.

As Patrick Jephson comments, the King's calm, unhurried approach in his first year has been comforting. Still, in an era of rapid change, the monarchy's relevance and value need constant re-affirmation.

King Charles